PATENT FLOW · NOW LIVE

More filings through your bench. Your standard on every one.

Paximal’s agents take each matter from raw invention documents to a reviewed, proofread, Born Strong™ application: the same stages and the same checkpoints on every filing. Your attorneys make every decision.

SOC 2 certified. Attorney-controlled. Never used to train AI models.

TRUSTED BY IP FIRMS AND IN-HOUSE PATENT TEAMS

THE PATENT FLOW

Every stage defined. Every decision yours.

Each stage shows who acts (the inventor, Paximal, or the attorney), what it produces, and what comes next. Run the stages your matter needs, skip the rest, and rerun any stage when the facts change. Nothing downstream starts until the stage before it is ready.

Capture

Analyze

Draft

Review

File

STAGE GROUP 3 OF 5

Draft

The full application with figures, built around checkpoints where you set the claim strategy.

07 Inventor interview (optional)

08 Application generation

HOW IT WORKS

The agent asks. You answer. The run continues.

The agent asks. You answer. The run continues.

Attorney-directed checkpoints.

Paximal pauses to ask about the target for protection, the first independent claim, the dependent set, and the figures, in plain language. Every answer is kept, so the file shows who decided what.

A record you can audit.

Proofreading and applied feedback create numbered revisions, and every review points to one run and one revision. Your team always knows exactly what it’s looking at.

Control at every step.

Skip any optional stage, run a stage again when the facts change, or stop a run at any time.

PAXIMAL MCP SERVER

Run your filing program from the tools your team already uses.

Every stage is available as a tool over the Model Context Protocol. Connect Claude, ChatGPT, Cursor, or your own agents, and bring in your docketing or document management system through your own integration. Start matters, answer checkpoints, and retrieve finished work without opening the app. Same account, same permissions, same SOC 2 boundary.

ASSISTANT · PAXIMAL CONNECTED

You

Use Paximal to start a new project from the invention documents in this folder.

Assistant

Project created. Intake is complete and the analysis stages are ready to run.

You

What’s waiting on me?

Assistant

One checkpoint: Paximal needs you to confirm the target for protection before drafting the claims.

You

Send me the revised draft.

Assistant

Here’s revision 2, with the feedback applied.

TOOL CALLS

create_project

create_document_upload_session

update_project_intake

advance_project

get_project_status

respond_to_alignment

get_completed_files

PROOF

Speed is easy. Speed with quality shows up in the file wrapper.

~80% allowed within one Office action

About 10% were allowed on first action, and about 70% after a single Office action. This is Born Strong™ in the file wrapper.

10

%

first-action allowance

70

%

allowed after one Office action

~80% of prior art rejections overcome with targeted amendments

About 65% of applications received a §102/§103 rejection at first action. Of those, roughly 80% were traversed with targeted claim amendments, often clarifying language or promoting allowable dependent matter.

65

%

§102/§103 prior art at first action

80

%

traversed via targeted amendments

0% §112(a) enablement rejections · ~4 hrs average prep

No enablement rejections across the cohort. Only about 20% received minor §112(b) clarifications, all promptly resolved. Average prep from inventor materials to filing-ready is about 4 hours, including alignment and final review. Typical manual drafting takes 20 to 30 hours.

0

%

§112(a) enablement rejections

4

hrs

average prep, inventor materials to filing-ready

~80% allowed within one Office action

About 10% were allowed on first action, and about 70% after a single Office action. This is Born Strong™ in the file wrapper.

10

%

first-action allowance

70

%

allowed after one Office action

~80% of prior art rejections overcome with targeted amendments

About 65% of applications received a §102/§103 rejection at first action. Of those, roughly 80% were traversed with targeted claim amendments, often clarifying language or promoting allowable dependent matter.

65

%

§102/§103 prior art at first action

80

%

traversed via targeted amendments

0% §112(a) enablement rejections · ~4 hrs average prep

No enablement rejections across the cohort. Only about 20% received minor §112(b) clarifications, all promptly resolved. Average prep from inventor materials to filing-ready is about 4 hours, including alignment and final review. Typical manual drafting takes 20 to 30 hours.

0

%

§112(a) enablement rejections

4

hrs

average prep, inventor materials to filing-ready

~80% allowed within one Office action

About 10% were allowed on first action, and about 70% after a single Office action. This is Born Strong™ in the file wrapper.

10

%

first-action allowance

70

%

allowed after one Office action

~80% of prior art rejections overcome with targeted amendments

About 65% of applications received a §102/§103 rejection at first action. Of those, roughly 80% were traversed with targeted claim amendments, often clarifying language or promoting allowable dependent matter.

65

%

§102/§103 prior art at first action

80

%

traversed via targeted amendments

0% §112(a) enablement rejections · ~4 hrs average prep

No enablement rejections across the cohort. Only about 20% received minor §112(b) clarifications, all promptly resolved. Average prep from inventor materials to filing-ready is about 4 hours, including alignment and final review. Typical manual drafting takes 20 to 30 hours.

0

%

§112(a) enablement rejections

4

hrs

average prep, inventor materials to filing-ready

Case Study 01 — Accelerated patent applications prosecuted to allowance at the USPTO

The results above come from a cohort of applications drafted by Paximal. Read the full analysis.

Read the analysis

Case Study 02 — How RapidSOS’s in-house team drafts more patents, with the quality it expects.

Read the full story behind the results — we’ll email you the PDF.

Get the case study

WHAT PATENT TEAMS SAY

“Paximal lets us move faster on first drafts without giving up the attorney judgment our portfolio depends on.”

Will Piggott, Esq., IP Counsel, RapidSOS

“…the difference with Paximal shows up in the draft itself. The structure holds, the language is precise, and the application reads like it was built by someone who understands patent prosecution. That’s not something you get from a generic AI solution.”

Ted Wood, Esq., Founder & Managing Partner, Wood IP LLC

Ted Wood, Esq., Founder & Managing Partner, Wood IP LLC

SECURITY & CONFIDENTIALITY

Secure by design.

Your invention materials stay private, and we can prove it.

GET STARTED

Ready to run your first matter?

Start in the app, or sign in for your MCP key and run it from your assistant. USPTO-registered practitioners can start a free trial.

info@paximal.com

GET STARTED

Ready to run your first matter?

Start in the app, or sign in for your MCP key and run it from your assistant. USPTO-registered practitioners can start a free trial.

info@paximal.com

GET STARTED

Ready to run your first matter?

Start in the app, or sign in for your MCP key and run it from your assistant. USPTO-registered practitioners can start a free trial.

info@paximal.com